spnanonhaven (
spnanonhaven) wrote2012-06-26 12:09 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
#84
This post is for show discussion and fandom gossip only. NO ACTOR GOSSIP, NO ACTOR BASHING!!
THIS JOURNAL LOGS IPS.
Backup location:
spnanonhaven
RULES:
1. No posting f-locked content.
2. No linking between RL and online identities.
3. Keep the actor gossip to these posts or take it to
spn_gossip.
4. Keep spoilery information out of thread titles.
5. No embedding music.
6. Embedded images must be SFW.
KEY:
AYRT = "I am the anon you're replying to." | DA = "I am a different anon from the one you're replying to, and already commented somewhere else on this thread."
NA = "I'm a new anon who has not commented on this thread before." | SA = "I'm the same anon, replying to my own comment to edit/elaborate."
AIRT = "The anon I replied to." | ITT = "In this thread." | OP = "Original post / original poster."

american bald eagle - image source
Off-Topic | Fanworks Discussion | Reference | Flatview
THIS JOURNAL LOGS IPS.
Backup location:
![[personal profile]](https://s.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
RULES:
1. No posting f-locked content.
2. No linking between RL and online identities.
3. Keep the actor gossip to these posts or take it to
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
4. Keep spoilery information out of thread titles.
5. No embedding music.
6. Embedded images must be SFW.
KEY:
AYRT = "I am the anon you're replying to." | DA = "I am a different anon from the one you're replying to, and already commented somewhere else on this thread."
NA = "I'm a new anon who has not commented on this thread before." | SA = "I'm the same anon, replying to my own comment to edit/elaborate."
AIRT = "The anon I replied to." | ITT = "In this thread." | OP = "Original post / original poster."

american bald eagle - image source
Off-Topic | Fanworks Discussion | Reference | Flatview
Re: Reunion speculation
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)If everything said about Dean pans out, I'll still like Dean fine and probably find his storyline a lot more gripping than last year's.
This is why I am upset about the Sam stuff and not about the Dean stuff.
/rocket science
Re: Reunion speculation
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 09:05 pm (UTC)(link)maybe the problem lies with you instead of with the spoilers.
Re: Reunion speculation
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)Seriously. All that tells me is that the ayrt isn't particularly invested in Dean but is probably over invested in Sam.
Re: Reunion speculation
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 09:09 pm (UTC)(link)Nothing about the spoilers has the potential to get Dean a hailstorm of hate otoh.
Re: Reunion speculation
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)Dean's spoilers has equally the same potential for a negative response and if it were Sam in his position, I'm sure we'd get the same exact OTT complaints about them.
Re: Reunion speculation
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 09:30 pm (UTC)(link)I'm not upset about Sam's spoilers because of hypothetical reactions to them; I'm upset about them because of my actual reaction to them.
If Dean had Sam's spoilers and situation, I wouldn't like Dean, unless there were some rabbit out of a hat to come.
If Sam had Dean's spoilers, well, I would respond a little more negatively than I have for Dean. Partly because the working with a monster and covering would be more repetitive for Sam than it is for Dean, partly because in the recent past Dean has been the one more willing to do things like work with Meg, and Sam has been more reluctant, so I'd have a harder time reconciling it with Sam's recent character. But in either case I find the making a give and take deal with a monster to escape purgatory perfectly comprehensible. With what they are doing with Sam, I literally cannot wrap my mind around it. That just isn't true of what they are doing with Dean.
I'm sorry it upsets you that people are reacting to the spoilers differently than you are, but your own reaction to their reactions seems, well, OTT and overreacty.
Re: Reunion speculation
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Reunion speculation
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Reunion speculation
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)I don't have nearly as much of a negative reaction to the Benny spoilers at this point, because after all the times they've worked with Crowley and Meg over the years (not to mention the alpha!vamp, ghost!Bobby, the witch-dude from this season, etc etc., working with supernatural entities when they have to has become something they do. It's not shocking or upsetting the way it was when Sam worked with Ruby, because they do it all the freakin' time. And AFAIK, Dean's not exchanging any bodily fluids with Benny, so I just don't see it as that big of a deal.
Re: Reunion speculation
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 09:37 pm (UTC)(link)This is demonstrably untrue, since people are generally not reacting to Dean's spoilers the same way they are to Sam's.
and if it were Sam in his position, I'm sure we'd get the same exact OTT complaints about them.
Personally, I'd be pretty OK if Sam had Dean's spoilers here.
Re: Reunion speculation
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 09:29 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Reunion speculation
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 09:30 pm (UTC)(link)demonmonster when they're separated. Fandom has never complained about that before!Re: Reunion speculation
(Anonymous) 2012-07-18 01:05 am (UTC)(link)Re: Reunion speculation
(Anonymous) 2012-07-18 08:42 am (UTC)(link)Re: Reunion speculation
(Anonymous) 2012-07-18 11:48 am (UTC)(link)well, I'm not a Dean"!girl, but can't deny it's justified.
But I think some of those post were trolling, anyway. Too OTT.