spnanonhaven: (Default)
spnanonhaven ([personal profile] spnanonhaven) wrote2012-06-26 12:09 am
Entry tags:

#84

This post is for show discussion and fandom gossip only. NO ACTOR GOSSIP, NO ACTOR BASHING!!
THIS JOURNAL LOGS IPS.
Backup location: [personal profile] spnanonhaven

RULES:
1. No posting f-locked content.
2. No linking between RL and online identities.
3. Keep the actor gossip to these posts or take it to [livejournal.com profile] spn_gossip.
4. Keep spoilery information out of thread titles.
5. No embedding music.
6. Embedded images must be SFW.

KEY:
AYRT
= "I am the anon you're replying to." | DA = "I am a different anon from the one you're replying to, and already commented somewhere else on this thread."
NA = "I'm a new anon who has not commented on this thread before." | SA = "I'm the same anon, replying to my own comment to edit/elaborate."
AIRT = "The anon I replied to." | ITT = "In this thread." | OP = "Original post / original poster."


american bald eagle - image source

Off-Topic | Fanworks Discussion | Reference | Flatview

Re: Reunion speculation

(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 08:55 pm (UTC)(link)
The reason that most people are saying that Sam's spoilers look a lot worse than Dean's is that to most people Sam's spoilers do, in fact, look a lot worse than Dean's. There's nothing mysterious about it. You're alone in your outrage and those objecting to the Sam stuff aren't alone in their outrage because more people agree with those objecting to the Sam stuff than with you.

Sometimes one thing is, in fact, worse than another.

Also, you're putting a lot of spin on the Dean spoilers, whereas the people reacting to the Sam spoilers are reacting to what has been explicitly and unambiguously said.