spnanonhaven

Entry tags:

show & fandom

#84

This post is for show discussion and fandom gossip only. NO ACTOR GOSSIP, NO ACTOR BASHING!!
THIS JOURNAL LOGS IPS.
Backup location:

spnanonhaven

RULES:
1. No posting f-locked content.
2. No linking between RL and online identities.
3. Keep the actor gossip to these posts or take it to

spn_gossip.
4. Keep spoilery information out of thread titles.
5. No embedding music.
6. Embedded images must be SFW.

KEY:
AYRT = "I am the anon you're replying to." | DA = "I am a different anon from the one you're replying to, and already commented somewhere else on this thread."
NA = "I'm a new anon who has not commented on this thread before." | SA = "I'm the same anon, replying to my own comment to edit/elaborate."
AIRT = "The anon I replied to." | ITT = "In this thread." | OP = "Original post / original poster."

american bald eagle - image source

Off-Topic | Fanworks Discussion | Reference | Flatview

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Maybe you're just remarking on the subject in general, in which case fine, but in this discussion, THEY DID SAY WHAT THEY WERE LINKING TO.

No, they didn't.

Yes, they did. It's not too far away up there! It's not that much of an effort to go up there and read it.

Either way, this much polemic is being raised because somebody posted a link to a gif (not even the gif itself; a LINK to a gif) concerning an event in an SPN Con that happened just now? What's this? SPN actors?!! Giving SPN interviews?! In my spnanon meme?!!!

What. In the World. Of fuck.

No, they didn't. Even the parent comment doesn't say, actually.

But apparently you think it's "polemic" to say it would be nice if people said what they're linking to. (In those exact words, for those following along in flatview; this isn't a disingenuous paraphrase.) So... god knows how you'll interpret this comment. I'm sure it must seem like eighteen thousand kinds of aggressive!

Something about the way Misha moves his head there

Yes, they did.

"Misha" isn't a pairing.

And? There's no pairing content in the gif. It's two coworkers horsing around.

Don't pretend to be stupid, nonnie. You know perfectly well why people are posting it.

Shenanigans*, of course. But if the random flatviewer is so devoid of context, you wouldn't be able guess who's hands, and as nonnies have posted again and again and again, Misha was already mentioned in the comment it was linked to.

*Though shenanigans=/= ship listing. Whatever you use for your ship fodder does not make the material itself shippy. That logic is just unfair to the peeps that like gen.

Because it's a fun gif?

ayrt

Sure. But that doesn't make it a Cockles gif, any more than a screencap from the show of Dean and Castiel interacting is in and of itself a D/C image.

It would sure be nice if people who are posting a gif for a pairing would mention the pairing when they post it.

Wait, I think I already said this. A long way up the thread. But apparently the slight difference in phrasing in this version is very important to you? I hope you enjoy the rephrased version; you wanked hard for it!

This isn't a pairing gif, tho that was the point of this convo.

Also, didn't we have a similar wank with a wincest gif before?

I don't understand. Does the nonnie complaining about lack of paring warning believe those two are an item? ?_?

... Something I haven't considered.

Surely Cockles is too rare to have a out and about tinhat?

Re: Wincest/J2 fandoms have died...

(Anonymous) - 2012-07-17 00:47 (UTC) - Expand

You are pretty stupid, aren't you, nonnie? People are posting the gif for shipping reasons. We've had this convo and you've acknowledged that. It would sure be nice if people who are posting a gif for shipping reasons would mention the ship when they post it.

SHHHHH.

Oh, Misha... Why so coy?

http://payload63.cargocollective.com/1/7/227434/3572903/IMG_0644_508px.jpg

DAMMIT WARN FOR DISTURBING CERAMIC BEARS

I'M ON TO YOU, EWenlockG!!

it actually appears to be one coworker being non-con horsed by another.

:DDD

da

ew ew trigger warning

jk, jk, I've seen it a hundred times on Tumblr, I feel dirty.

The other person was a pair hands. I don't think it warrants a pairing description.

That.

(unless nonnie doesn't know what a "misha" is? dunno.)

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only