spnanonhaven (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
spnanonhaven) wrote2012-06-26 12:09 am
spnanonhaven) wrote2012-06-26 12:09 am
Entry tags:
#84
This post is for show discussion and fandom gossip only. NO ACTOR GOSSIP, NO ACTOR BASHING!!
THIS JOURNAL LOGS IPS.
Backup location:![[personal profile]](https://s.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
spnanonhaven
RULES:
1. No posting f-locked content.
2. No linking between RL and online identities.
3. Keep the actor gossip to these posts or take it to![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
spn_gossip.
4. Keep spoilery information out of thread titles.
5. No embedding music.
6. Embedded images must be SFW.
KEY:
AYRT = "I am the anon you're replying to." | DA = "I am a different anon from the one you're replying to, and already commented somewhere else on this thread."
NA = "I'm a new anon who has not commented on this thread before." | SA = "I'm the same anon, replying to my own comment to edit/elaborate."
AIRT = "The anon I replied to." | ITT = "In this thread." | OP = "Original post / original poster."
american bald eagle - image source
Off-Topic | Fanworks Discussion | Reference | Flatview
THIS JOURNAL LOGS IPS.
Backup location:
spnanonhavenRULES:
1. No posting f-locked content.
2. No linking between RL and online identities.
3. Keep the actor gossip to these posts or take it to
spn_gossip. 4. Keep spoilery information out of thread titles.
5. No embedding music.
6. Embedded images must be SFW.
KEY:
AYRT = "I am the anon you're replying to." | DA = "I am a different anon from the one you're replying to, and already commented somewhere else on this thread."
NA = "I'm a new anon who has not commented on this thread before." | SA = "I'm the same anon, replying to my own comment to edit/elaborate."
AIRT = "The anon I replied to." | ITT = "In this thread." | OP = "Original post / original poster."
american bald eagle - image source
Off-Topic | Fanworks Discussion | Reference | Flatview
Re: Any love for the brothers left on here?
(Anonymous) 2012-07-10 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)I think it's both the writing and their relationship. The writers seem to portray Sam and Dean as a parent-child relationship instead of an actual brother relationship. It kind of bothers me.
Re: Any love for the brothers left on here?
(Anonymous) 2012-07-10 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)I don't see that at all. Maybe in the first seasons, but not since Dean went to hell. Sorry, nonnie.
Re: Any love for the brothers left on here?
(Anonymous) 2012-07-10 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)I see it. Glimpses of it. It's still there. They've been stuck in these roles forever. I doubt that they'll ever break free...which is unfortunate for them.
Re: Any love for the brothers left on here?
(Anonymous) 2012-07-10 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Any love for the brothers left on here?
(Anonymous) 2012-07-10 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)Huh. I agree that I don't see that role for them anymore but S4 felt to be the most heavily parent/child-ified season for them in the entire series for me. Sam cast Dean as the John-like paternal figure to rebel against and Dean kept trying to protect Sam, even if he fucked up in doing so. It even ended in a reiteration of the Stanford argument!
S5 and after though, yeah, not feeling it there anymore.