#84

[spnanonhaven]

This post is for show discussion and fandom gossip only. NO ACTOR GOSSIP, NO ACTOR BASHING!!
THIS JOURNAL LOGS IPS.
Backup location: spnanonhaven

RULES:
1. No posting f-locked content.
2. No linking between RL and online identities.
3. Keep the actor gossip to these posts or take it to spn_gossip.
4. Keep spoilery information out of thread titles.
5. No embedding music.
6. Embedded images must be SFW.

KEY:
AYRT = "I am the anon you're replying to." | DA = "I am a different anon from the one you're replying to, and already commented somewhere else on this thread."
NA = "I'm a new anon who has not commented on this thread before." | SA = "I'm the same anon, replying to my own comment to edit/elaborate."
AIRT = "The anon I replied to." | ITT = "In this thread." | OP = "Original post / original poster."


american bald eagle - image source

Off-Topic | Fanworks Discussion | Reference | Flatview

Comments

Re: Extended TV Guide spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

da

I strongly disagree. Not about the concept of family and the immediateness that had made the first seasons work so well, but the introduction of the angels wasn't the turning point. Sam and Dean both played vital, incredibly important roles to the plot in S4. It was S5 that had the switch to Sam and Dean being unimportant and unnecessary, only their bodies serving a purpose. S5 is where it lost focus and became much less interesting, IMO.

The angels are fine as long as they aren't robbing the Winchester family dynamic for their roles (see Michael and Lucifer) and as long as Sam and Dean have a part to play and aren't written into the sidelines (see S6).

Re: Extended TV Guide spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

I think you are discounting the fact that S4 led directly to S5. The introduction of the angels represented a lot more than just some cool new characters--it brought in heaven and God and the Devil and the fucking apocalypse. I think in hindsight, that was way too big for this show to handle, and judging by Singer's comments, the people running the show seem to know it. You can't separate the angels from the apocalypse, and I think that's what changed the show from an intricate family drama to whatever it is now.

Re: Extended TV Guide spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

And you're discounting the fact that S3 led directly to S4 and that, in S4, the focus was still heavily on Sam and Dean as individuals. The stupid vessel thing makes no sense based on the story they were setting up in S4, where Dean was being tested on his ability to lead angels and Ruby was manipulating Sam into freeing Lucifer, not housing him.

An apocalypse storyline is fine. What wasn't fine was taking the focus off Sam and Dean as individuals and making them bit players. That's where the show went wonky but that itself had nothing to do with the apocalypse as a whole. There could have been truly amazing stories where Dean and Sam were main players in the story and not sidelined as unimportant. S4 was setting up for that. S5 did not.