#84

[spnanonhaven]

This post is for show discussion and fandom gossip only. NO ACTOR GOSSIP, NO ACTOR BASHING!!
THIS JOURNAL LOGS IPS.
Backup location: spnanonhaven

RULES:
1. No posting f-locked content.
2. No linking between RL and online identities.
3. Keep the actor gossip to these posts or take it to spn_gossip.
4. Keep spoilery information out of thread titles.
5. No embedding music.
6. Embedded images must be SFW.

KEY:
AYRT = "I am the anon you're replying to." | DA = "I am a different anon from the one you're replying to, and already commented somewhere else on this thread."
NA = "I'm a new anon who has not commented on this thread before." | SA = "I'm the same anon, replying to my own comment to edit/elaborate."
AIRT = "The anon I replied to." | ITT = "In this thread." | OP = "Original post / original poster."


american bald eagle - image source

Off-Topic | Fanworks Discussion | Reference | Flatview

Comments

Re: Extended TV Guide spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

sa

Whatever the fuck 'threat' really means anyway. I guess it means 'x Winchester cares about y character.' Which is a problem because you're only allowed to care about one person at a time, maybe?

Re: Extended TV Guide spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

na

Often the tone of conversations seem to carry that message (caring about anyone else means less care available for their brother). But in this case, I think "not seen as a threat to their relationship" comes from the relationship being seen as sexual (and monogamous). Or committed to brother-focused celibacy, I guess. It's only Ruby, and briefly Amy, who actually resulted in any conflict between Sam and Dean. And as an aside, I've become thoroughly sick of people who call for less conflict between them (even though there's been less of that cry since S7). A bit of conflict that gets resolved makes ~sparks~ and handholding or whatever you're into more likely.