spnanonhaven (
spnanonhaven) wrote2012-06-26 12:09 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
#84
This post is for show discussion and fandom gossip only. NO ACTOR GOSSIP, NO ACTOR BASHING!!
THIS JOURNAL LOGS IPS.
Backup location:
spnanonhaven
RULES:
1. No posting f-locked content.
2. No linking between RL and online identities.
3. Keep the actor gossip to these posts or take it to
spn_gossip.
4. Keep spoilery information out of thread titles.
5. No embedding music.
6. Embedded images must be SFW.
KEY:
AYRT = "I am the anon you're replying to." | DA = "I am a different anon from the one you're replying to, and already commented somewhere else on this thread."
NA = "I'm a new anon who has not commented on this thread before." | SA = "I'm the same anon, replying to my own comment to edit/elaborate."
AIRT = "The anon I replied to." | ITT = "In this thread." | OP = "Original post / original poster."

american bald eagle - image source
Off-Topic | Fanworks Discussion | Reference | Flatview
THIS JOURNAL LOGS IPS.
Backup location:
![[personal profile]](https://s.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
RULES:
1. No posting f-locked content.
2. No linking between RL and online identities.
3. Keep the actor gossip to these posts or take it to
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
4. Keep spoilery information out of thread titles.
5. No embedding music.
6. Embedded images must be SFW.
KEY:
AYRT = "I am the anon you're replying to." | DA = "I am a different anon from the one you're replying to, and already commented somewhere else on this thread."
NA = "I'm a new anon who has not commented on this thread before." | SA = "I'm the same anon, replying to my own comment to edit/elaborate."
AIRT = "The anon I replied to." | ITT = "In this thread." | OP = "Original post / original poster."

american bald eagle - image source
Off-Topic | Fanworks Discussion | Reference | Flatview
Re: Are we really that bad?
(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)BAH, I was actually AYRT. And I'm amused how different my list is from the one above. It probably depends on your ship.
Re: Are we really that bad?
(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 09:12 pm (UTC)(link)I just realized why the above list is so different. Um...yeah.
Re: Are we really that bad?
(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 09:17 pm (UTC)(link)Share with the class? I've never even heard of most of the people on the first list.
Re: Are we really that bad?
(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 09:20 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Are we really that bad?
(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 09:21 pm (UTC)(link)I think they're the people from BB recently? IDK though. Ignore overly hostile anon, I don't see it as being stupid or wanky to ask for clarification here.
Re: Are we really that bad?
(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you haven't made the connection but basically anon was trolling with a list of people who are very much not bnf
Re: Are we really that bad?
(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)I wondered, but I thought cherie_morte was pretty hot stuff, so then I was confused. Thanks for the clarification.
Re: Are we really that bad?
(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)Yeah idk with c_m, I've enjoyed some of her past stuff but I thought her BB this year was incredibly disappointing. I've seen nonnies describe her stuff as badfic (which the BB would fall under imo) but there is one fic of hers which is one of my favorites. I think maybe she's just not capable of being very versatile rn and that's why the quality of her writing varies.
Re: Are we really that bad?
(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)Yeah, I dunno. Most of what I've read of hers I'd consider idfic (including the bb), but that's not the same as badfic. I liked the bb until the end, so obviously we differ here, but regardless badfic can get soooooooo much worse than anything I've seen her write.