spnanonhaven: (Default)
spnanonhaven ([personal profile] spnanonhaven) wrote2012-06-26 12:09 am
Entry tags:

#84

This post is for show discussion and fandom gossip only. NO ACTOR GOSSIP, NO ACTOR BASHING!!
THIS JOURNAL LOGS IPS.
Backup location: [personal profile] spnanonhaven

RULES:
1. No posting f-locked content.
2. No linking between RL and online identities.
3. Keep the actor gossip to these posts or take it to [livejournal.com profile] spn_gossip.
4. Keep spoilery information out of thread titles.
5. No embedding music.
6. Embedded images must be SFW.

KEY:
AYRT
= "I am the anon you're replying to." | DA = "I am a different anon from the one you're replying to, and already commented somewhere else on this thread."
NA = "I'm a new anon who has not commented on this thread before." | SA = "I'm the same anon, replying to my own comment to edit/elaborate."
AIRT = "The anon I replied to." | ITT = "In this thread." | OP = "Original post / original poster."


american bald eagle - image source

Off-Topic | Fanworks Discussion | Reference | Flatview

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 08:41 pm (UTC)(link)
ayrt

So what would you say are the causes of that? I mean, it seems like some degree of BNFing would be bound to happen in any fandom - that is, there'd be people who write better / produce fic more regularly / hit the fandom's kinks / come in knowing more people in the fandom / run all the things. I would expect people with a lot of those qualities to naturally end up with more readers and thus more comments on their fic.

Plus, this fandom is so big that it makes sense that the BNFs would be R(eally)BNFs.

So, as one of the people no one's heard of, I definitely get frustrated when I feel like a fic of mine is being ignored. But I guess I see that and BNFs as both being symptoms of a huge, sprawling fandom - which HP also was, obvs.

Am I way off base here? What do you think?