spnanonhaven: (Default)
spnanonhaven ([personal profile] spnanonhaven) wrote2012-06-26 12:09 am
Entry tags:

#84

This post is for show discussion and fandom gossip only. NO ACTOR GOSSIP, NO ACTOR BASHING!!
THIS JOURNAL LOGS IPS.
Backup location: [personal profile] spnanonhaven

RULES:
1. No posting f-locked content.
2. No linking between RL and online identities.
3. Keep the actor gossip to these posts or take it to [livejournal.com profile] spn_gossip.
4. Keep spoilery information out of thread titles.
5. No embedding music.
6. Embedded images must be SFW.

KEY:
AYRT
= "I am the anon you're replying to." | DA = "I am a different anon from the one you're replying to, and already commented somewhere else on this thread."
NA = "I'm a new anon who has not commented on this thread before." | SA = "I'm the same anon, replying to my own comment to edit/elaborate."
AIRT = "The anon I replied to." | ITT = "In this thread." | OP = "Original post / original poster."


american bald eagle - image source

Off-Topic | Fanworks Discussion | Reference | Flatview

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
na

One thing I miss about blindfold is people talking about the prompts on meme or doing page number exchanges.

I miss this, too! But maybe all it takes is somebody to actually start talking about some prompts they're interested in and then others will join in?

I had kind of hoped to "promote" the kinkmeme a little with the reminder that some other nonnies and I post at the beginning of every month; maybe we could use that thread to talk about the prompts or open a new one?

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 06:35 pm (UTC)(link)
I had kind of hoped to "promote" the kinkmeme a little with the reminder that some other nonnies and I post at the beginning of every month; maybe we could use that thread to talk about the prompts or open a new one?

That sounds like a great idea! Maybe so we could have more to talk about (since there will be fewer prompts when the post just opened), people could talk about the previous month's prompts in that thread?

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 06:53 pm (UTC)(link)
ayrt

Sure! In fact, they could talk about any prompt, no matter in which month it was first posted, cause a lot of the prompts get re-posted anyway. Although I doubt that many people will go back and look at prompts that are like 5 months old, so the focus could, as you suggested, be the previous month and of course the new, incoming prompts.

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 07:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I think this is a marvelous notion. I approve!

Would it be too much to have a similar thread/reminder on the 15th, at the end of the prompting session?

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 07:23 pm (UTC)(link)
sa

Er, by which I meant that then we could focus on the prompts from that session instead of the previous session, which kind of makes more sense to me.

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 07:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Now is the time to go forth and fill?

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 07:25 pm (UTC)(link)
You mean, spending our efforts writing fills instead of talking about them? Possibly you have a point. :)

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 07:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I just meant that could be the thrust of a thread started on the 15th.

Though, I don't know why we aren't talking about prompts now. We could totally be talking about them today. In this thread. Right now.

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 07:32 pm (UTC)(link)
da

I'm the one who prompted werebat!Misha/Jared's hair. And I am pining.

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 08:17 pm (UTC)(link)
If you want to start a discussion you have to link, nonny.

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)
ayrt

Apologies!

http://spnkink-meme.livejournal.com/60920.html?thread=18299640#t18299640

I've prompted a few silly Misha-centric prompts this round, but this might be my favorite. :)

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 09:01 pm (UTC)(link)
da

That's one of my favourites, too. Relentlessly adorable.

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 09:21 pm (UTC)(link)
I adore that prompt.

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 08:37 pm (UTC)(link)
da

Okay, I clearly need to start reading the kink meme on a regular basis, because that is amazing. Just thinking about that makes me happy.

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 07:36 pm (UTC)(link)
da

I'm all for it \o/.

Okay, so did anybody else see that the mods had to delete a fill in the underage section, because it was plagiarized from a story posted on Nifty? I think that was the first time that something like that happened on the kinkmeme. I didn't read the fic in question, but I remember that the author didn't even post it anon, so now I'm obviously wondering if some other steps have to be taken, too.

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 07:40 pm (UTC)(link)
da

I didn't (I don't check out the underage prompts section). I heard tell that there was a kink shaming incident early in the round, though. I'm guessing these were two separate things...

Maybe she will be reported to one of the plagiarism places?

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 07:44 pm (UTC)(link)
ayrt

Yeah. I completely missed the kink shaming incident, but I saw the mod's comment later, and it was a reply to a different prompt, so the two things aren't related.

That's exactly what I was wondering. I forgot the exact name, but isn't there a comm that focuses on plagiarized fanfic?

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 07:45 pm (UTC)(link)

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 08:01 pm (UTC)(link)
That's it! Thank you so much :D

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 07:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Is there a link to any discussion of this? I love plagiarism kerfuffles.

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 07:54 pm (UTC)(link)
ayrt

Not really. Everything got deleted, and there wasn't any discussion. The author, who, judged by previous comments they made in the thread, is very obviously ESL, but posted a fill in 10 parts that was written in like perfect English. Then, some time today, someone pointed that fact out and provided a link to the story on Nifty that was plagiarized, and when I checked again later on, the mod had already deleted everything.

Here's a link to the prompt, though, in case you're interested.
[underage obv.] http://spnkink-meme.livejournal.com/60987.html?thread=18141755#t18141755

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 07:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks for the link!

Re: Are we really that bad?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 07:30 pm (UTC)(link)
ayrt

Not too much at all IMO! We'll be in a different post then, so I doubt that I'd be too much to have another kinkmeme thread. To start the second thread at the 15th is an awesome idea, btw.