spnanonhaven: (Default)
spnanonhaven ([personal profile] spnanonhaven) wrote2012-06-26 12:09 am
Entry tags:

#84

This post is for show discussion and fandom gossip only. NO ACTOR GOSSIP, NO ACTOR BASHING!!
THIS JOURNAL LOGS IPS.
Backup location: [personal profile] spnanonhaven

RULES:
1. No posting f-locked content.
2. No linking between RL and online identities.
3. Keep the actor gossip to these posts or take it to [livejournal.com profile] spn_gossip.
4. Keep spoilery information out of thread titles.
5. No embedding music.
6. Embedded images must be SFW.

KEY:
AYRT
= "I am the anon you're replying to." | DA = "I am a different anon from the one you're replying to, and already commented somewhere else on this thread."
NA = "I'm a new anon who has not commented on this thread before." | SA = "I'm the same anon, replying to my own comment to edit/elaborate."
AIRT = "The anon I replied to." | ITT = "In this thread." | OP = "Original post / original poster."


american bald eagle - image source

Off-Topic | Fanworks Discussion | Reference | Flatview

Re: Major Spoilers: TV Guide Interview w/ Robert Singer

(Anonymous) 2012-07-08 08:45 pm (UTC)(link)
There have been some really nasty bits of Sam-bashing on this topic, and every one that I've read that's been identifiable in origin has come from an ESG.

My ideal would be for Dean to have essential agency (and monster help would be cool) but for Sam to play a necessary role in the purgatory escape, but Dean getting himself out is among my preferred options. What I don't really want is for their to be some mystery about how and why Dean is out -- I think they've played that one enough. But I can see that for flashback narrative to mesh organically with present it may have to be structured partly as mystery with clues.