spnanonhaven: (Default)
spnanonhaven ([personal profile] spnanonhaven) wrote2012-06-26 12:09 am
Entry tags:

#84

This post is for show discussion and fandom gossip only. NO ACTOR GOSSIP, NO ACTOR BASHING!!
THIS JOURNAL LOGS IPS.
Backup location: [personal profile] spnanonhaven

RULES:
1. No posting f-locked content.
2. No linking between RL and online identities.
3. Keep the actor gossip to these posts or take it to [livejournal.com profile] spn_gossip.
4. Keep spoilery information out of thread titles.
5. No embedding music.
6. Embedded images must be SFW.

KEY:
AYRT
= "I am the anon you're replying to." | DA = "I am a different anon from the one you're replying to, and already commented somewhere else on this thread."
NA = "I'm a new anon who has not commented on this thread before." | SA = "I'm the same anon, replying to my own comment to edit/elaborate."
AIRT = "The anon I replied to." | ITT = "In this thread." | OP = "Original post / original poster."


american bald eagle - image source

Off-Topic | Fanworks Discussion | Reference | Flatview

MOD Re: What would be a happily ever after for SPN?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-07 02:37 pm (UTC)(link)
This is a bit of a grey ares, but I believe at one point you ruled that discussing specific problematic issues with an actor's public statements about character or show was one thing, and simply stating "real person X is racist, sexist, homophobic, etc." was different and not acceptable.

I'm feeling personally like meme has gone from having occasional discussions about something that is genuinely show relevant as well as related to broader issues to dragging it in out of the blue to bash.