spnanonhaven: (Default)
spnanonhaven ([personal profile] spnanonhaven) wrote2012-06-26 12:09 am
Entry tags:

#84

This post is for show discussion and fandom gossip only. NO ACTOR GOSSIP, NO ACTOR BASHING!!
THIS JOURNAL LOGS IPS.
Backup location: [personal profile] spnanonhaven

RULES:
1. No posting f-locked content.
2. No linking between RL and online identities.
3. Keep the actor gossip to these posts or take it to [livejournal.com profile] spn_gossip.
4. Keep spoilery information out of thread titles.
5. No embedding music.
6. Embedded images must be SFW.

KEY:
AYRT
= "I am the anon you're replying to." | DA = "I am a different anon from the one you're replying to, and already commented somewhere else on this thread."
NA = "I'm a new anon who has not commented on this thread before." | SA = "I'm the same anon, replying to my own comment to edit/elaborate."
AIRT = "The anon I replied to." | ITT = "In this thread." | OP = "Original post / original poster."


american bald eagle - image source

Off-Topic | Fanworks Discussion | Reference | Flatview

Re: What would be a happily ever after for SPN?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-07 12:57 pm (UTC)(link)
What if they become ghosts. Who are hunters.

GHOST HUNTERS. Saving people, hunting things. Forever.

T_T

Re: What would be a happily ever after for SPN?

(Anonymous) 2012-07-07 01:23 pm (UTC)(link)
ayrt

Well, they'd have to either be intending a horrendously tragic vision where Sam and Dean are going to gradually, inevitably decay into the very things they hunt or have some convincing and not hand-wavey explanation for why the established canon on how ghosts work and established characterization (for Dean especially) on the natural order and how what's dead should stay dead don't apply.

I think Sam and Dean becoming reapers or some such works better as a version of that scenario. It puts them in an immortal in-between state with a function without as much world-building awkwardness to work around.